The {bidux}
package helps Shiny developers create more
effective dashboards using the Behavior Insight Design (BID)
Framework. This framework integrates psychological principles,
UX best practices, and data storytelling techniques to guide the
development of dashboards that are easier to understand, more engaging,
and more effective at supporting user decisions.
The BID framework consists of 5 sequential stages:
This sequential process forms a structured approach to dashboard design, with each stage building on the insights from previous stages.
The BID framework is built on established psychological and design
principles. To explore these concepts, use bid_concepts()
to list all available concepts, or search for specific terms:
# List all concepts
all_concepts <- bid_concepts()
head(dplyr::select(all_concepts, concept, category, description), 3)
# Search for specific concepts
bid_concepts("cognitive") |>
dplyr::select(concept, description, implementation_tips)
For detailed information about a specific concept, use
bid_concept()
:
# Get information about a specific concept
bid_concept("Processing Fluency") |>
dplyr::select(concept, description, implementation_tips)
The bid_concept()
function supports case-insensitive and
partial matching:
# Case-insensitive matching
bid_concept("hick's law") |>
dplyr::select(concept, description)
# Partial matching
bid_concept("proximity") |>
dplyr::select(concept, description)
You can also explore concepts that are new to the BID framework:
Let’s walk through a complete example of using the BID framework to document and improve a dashboard project.
Start by identifying the specific problems users are encountering with your dashboard or interface:
# Document the problem
notice_result <- bid_notice(
problem = "Users are overwhelmed by too many filter options and struggle to find relevant insights",
evidence = "User testing shows 65% of first-time users fail to complete their intended task within 2 minutes",
target_audience = "Marketing team members with varying technical skills"
)
notice_result |>
dplyr::select(problem, theory, evidence, target_audience)
Notice that the function automatically selected an appropriate theory
based on our problem description. It also provides suggestions for
addressing cognitive load which you can access from the
suggestions
column.
Next, clarify the central question your dashboard needs to answer and structure the data story:
# Document the user's need
interpret_result <- bid_interpret(
previous_stage = notice_result,
central_question = "How are our marketing campaigns performing across different channels?",
data_story = list(
hook = "Recent campaign performance varies significantly across channels",
context = "We've invested in 6 different marketing channels over the past quarter",
tension = "ROI metrics show inconsistent results, with some channels underperforming",
resolution = "Identify top-performing channels and key performance drivers",
audience = "Marketing team and executives",
metrics = c("Channel ROI", "Conversion Rate", "Cost per Acquisition"),
visual_approach = "Comparative analysis with historical benchmarks"
),
user_personas = list(
list(
name = "Marketing Manager",
goals = "Optimize marketing spend across channels",
pain_points = "Difficulty comparing performance across different metrics",
technical_level = "Intermediate"
),
list(
name = "CMO",
goals = "Strategic oversight of marketing effectiveness",
pain_points = "Needs high-level insights without technical details",
technical_level = "Basic"
)
)
)
interpret_result |>
dplyr::select(central_question, hook, tension, resolution)
The function evaluates our data story elements and provides
suggestions for improvement (in the suggestions
column).
We’ve also added user personas to better target our design.
Now determine the layout and key design principles to implement:
# Document the dashboard structure
structure_result <- bid_structure(
previous_stage = interpret_result,
layout = "dual_process",
concepts = c(
"Principle of Proximity",
"Default Effect",
"Visual Hierarchy",
"Breathable Layouts"
),
accessibility = list(
color_contrast = "Using WCAG AA-compliant color contrasts",
keyboard_navigation = "All interactive elements are keyboard accessible",
screen_reader = "Charts include descriptive alt text"
)
)
structure_result |>
dplyr::select(layout, concepts, accessibility)
The function provides layout-specific suggestions based on the psychological concepts we’ve chosen to apply, and acknowledges our accessibility considerations.
Identify potential cognitive biases that might affect how users interpret your dashboard:
# Document bias mitigation strategies
anticipate_result <- bid_anticipate(
previous_stage = structure_result,
bias_mitigations = list(
anchoring = "Include previous period performance as reference points",
framing = "Provide toggle between ROI improvement vs. ROI gap views",
confirmation_bias = "Highlight unexpected patterns that contradict common assumptions"
),
interaction_principles = list(
hover_effects = "Show detailed metrics on hover for each channel",
selection_feedback = "Highlight active filters with color and icon changes",
progressive_disclosure = "Reveal advanced options only when basic filters are applied"
)
)
anticipate_result |>
dplyr::select(bias_mitigations, interaction_principles)
The function evaluates our bias mitigation strategies and interaction principles, providing implementation suggestions for both.
Finally, document how you’ll ensure users leave with clear insights and the ability to collaborate:
# Document validation approach
validate_result <- bid_validate(
previous_stage = anticipate_result,
summary_panel = "Executive summary highlighting top and bottom performers, key trends, and recommended actions for the next marketing cycle",
collaboration = "Team annotation capability allowing marketing team members to add context and insights to specific data points",
next_steps = c(
"Review performance of bottom 2 channels",
"Increase budget for top-performing channel",
"Schedule team meeting to discuss optimization strategy",
"Export findings for quarterly marketing review"
)
)
validate_result |>
dplyr::select(summary_panel, collaboration, next_steps)
The validate function acknowledges our implementation of the Peak-End Rule through next steps and provides suggestions for refining our approach.
Once you’ve documented your dashboard with the BID framework, you can generate concrete suggestions for implementing the principles using common R packages:
# Get {bslib} component suggestions
bid_suggest_components(structure_result, package = "bslib") |>
dplyr::select(component, description) |>
head(2)
# Get {reactable} suggestions for showing data
bid_suggest_components(anticipate_result, package = "reactable") |>
dplyr::select(component, description) |>
head(2)
# Get suggestions from all supported packages
all_suggestions <- bid_suggest_components(validate_result, package = "all")
table(all_suggestions$package)
You can generate a complete report summarizing all stages of your BID process:
Here’s how to integrate the BID framework into your development process:
bid_suggest_components()
to get package-specific
implementation ideasbid_report()
to maintain comprehensive
documentationThe {bidux}
package makes it easier to apply
psychological principles and UX best practices to your Shiny dashboards.
By following the 5-stage BID framework, you can create applications that
are more intuitive, engaging, and effective for your users.
Future versions of {bidux}
will include:
Visit github.com/jrwinget/bidux for updates and to contribute to the package development. We welcome feedback and suggestions to help make the BID framework even more effective for Shiny developers.
Remember that good dashboard design is an iterative process that benefits from continuous user feedback. The BID framework provides structure to this process while ensuring psychological principles are incorporated throughout your development workflow.